Howdy, Mr Ploos.
We're ambitious these days, eh? Like yer oot on tha moors. . . moor o this and tha' in yer paintin's.
Your theme of "more" seems to have begun in the garden. More trimming and clearing. Then it carried over into your choice of paintings.
When you're having a time with keeping your details sorted as you mention with your folds, if you're not wanting to rely on tracing, you can consider an overlay grid. You put a grid over the source pic, and then a grid over your painting and you thus break it down into what is happening in each square. It's like cutting your food rather than trying to swallow a chicken whole.
But while using a grid goes back to the times around the Renaissance, at that long ago time, competing artists would call that cheating much the same as those artists not wanting to use the tracing feature, or the computer itself might. Nowadays using a grid would be considered old school. And it has its uses.
It means a small original photo can be blown up to a mural size for the side of a high rise building for example. But it can be any size. It just makes it possible to do whether going from a 5 x 7" pic to 15 x 21" canvas or 20 x 28 feet wall from the same little pic. Projectors can also be used in the real world to accomplish much of that scale changing. Illustrators used to use projectors where they would project several images onto a canvas for montages like for paperback jackets etc. They could do it freehand, but it took longer.
Personally, I have no problems with tracing which is the easiest. One still has challenges of looking at the model and translating that into the painting.
But it's a great exercise to do it freehand. Make your eyes cross in some cases, but it's a great way to train your hand-eye coordination.
Enjoying your work. I was impressed with your industry. And your getting good results, oh aye. That ye are, lad.
"Not a bit is wasted and the best is yet to come. . ." -- remembered from a dream