
Originally Posted by
chinapete
. . .<snip>
Their idea was (and is), according to this principle, if an artwork is handed down in some form incomplete, either unfinished or damaged, we still should be able to have a complete understanding of its meaning ... And, perhaps more importantly for my purposes, an artwork does not have to depict fully a scene for the entire scene to be understood ... This is a strategy I often use, by cropping or otherwise limiting what the viewer sees ...
Qian Zhongshu, the famous 20th c. Chinese critic (who was fluent and highly literate in five or six Western languages, and was expert in comparing Eastern and Western sources), wrote an essay about this concept (see source below); he first connects it to Chinese painting, and then to the act of reading in Chinese and in Western texts (he gives Shakespeare's line in "Rape of Lucrece" as evidence: "A hand, a foote, a face, a leg / Stood for the whole to be imagined") ...
It has been my experience, as I've looked at artworks over the years, that the best linger in my mind, and what lingers never is the whole work, but a highly charged detail, a color, a line, a shape, a mood, a harmony or a contrast ... This notion was expressed by an ancient Chinese writer in relation to a poem he was critiquing: "When the reading is over, something lingers." (quoted by Qian Zhongshu, p30)